Every year as Elul begins, i think that I'm going to prepare for Rosh Hashanah in advance this time. That this time I will actually do some introspection before the new year. That this time I will not just pray properly each day, but do it with focus, at least for the month of Elul. That I will reach out to others and connect with them for the good this time.
You probably already know that each year, I get to the morning of Rosh Hashanah and realise that once again I have focused more on the menu than on inner growth.
Every year, so far, God has given me another chance. Every year I feel scared to ask for yet another one, because I messed up on this one. I honestly wish I could cower in bed instead of having to face my Creator with the nakedness of my soul. I wish I could wave a sign that says 'I'm not here, don't look at me'. But, of course, for God I am here. I am always here, because He is always here.
On Rosh Hashanah we accept God as our King. That doesn't mean soul searching and saying sorry. I think it means being present. It means that instead of hiding from God like the first Adam on the first Rosh Hashanah, I stand up straight and scared and answer 'Hineni - Here I am' like Abraham. No fancy prayers or pleas for forgiveness (that comes later). Simply 'I am here', because if I hide myself then I am also hiding an aspect of God.
I have lost too many friends to not be fearful of what a year can bring. But I force myself each Rosh Hashanah to face what it could bring. I remind myself that the talmud teaches 'ein melech bli am - there is no King without a people', meaning that somehow God is King only insofar as we, His people, are His people. I stand with fear and trembling because to be noticed by the King is to be singled out for dangerous attention, but I stand anyway.
I think sometimes that this is the big challenge of Rosh Hashanah. Not to make it all through that long morning of prayer with focus (or at all). Simply to find the courage to stand up before God and acknowledge that I am here, flawed and fearful.
The Kotzke Rebbe once famously asked a young man 'Where is God?'
The young man felt a little smug and answered 'God is everywhere'.
The Kotzke replied 'No. He is wherever you let Him in'.
I am here. and if I am here, then God is too. I pray for the courage to be here and for the gift of another year.
Noonlight and moonshine
Amanda Bradley's writings and musings. Sometimes it's serious, sometimes it's just a bit of fun.
Tuesday 19 September 2017
Sunday 30 April 2017
Yom Hazikaron: Day of Past and Future Grief
As my oldest son gets older, I feel the tentacles of Yom Hazikaron wrapping themselves more firmly around me. Every year since we made aliyah, I feel the impact of this day more deeply. It rocks me that much further before I right myself again.
Partly this is the nature of living in Israel. I cannot help but feel the sadness and the solemnity of this day when I wake up each morning to hills that once were bloodstained but now are national parks, thanks to the boys whose blood once covered them. I can't help but feel the loss of men young and old when I just have to look at people in my neighbourhood to see the gaps in their families which gape open more widely on this day.
And partly, the longer I live here and the older my oldest son gets, the more I feel Yom Hazikaron, this day of memory, leeching into the future as well.
Every year, my son gets one day closer to receiving his tzav giyus - his first call-up papers. Every year we ratchet one notch closer to his friends receiving theirs. Every year, I fear, takes me one step closer to feeling this day far more intensely than I ever wish to feel it.
Perhaps I am morbid, but on this day of all days when I see my son's beautiful friends at a tekes yom hazikaron, shining with potential and excitement for the years ahead of them, I cannot avoid the knowledge that the chances of one of them being killed in battle are very high. I cannot help but look at my new-minted teenage son and see the shadow creeping towards him. One day, he will have to grapple with the burning pain of losing a friend, if not an old friend then a new friend, someone he has known since elementary school or someone he hasn't yet met. On Yom Hazikaron, I feel the pain of the past and the pain of the future.
I know that I am not the only mother who feels the pain of this day creeping forwards each year. I know that every year there will be new losses on this day,
families with new holes in them, friendships newly sundered.
Those young men and women who we have already lost are also not just lost in the past. They are lost in the future too. The children they would have born have been killed. The people they would have taught and changed live on untaught and unchanged and all unknowing of what they could have experienced. The inventions they would have developed, the art they would have created, the music they would have made and the worlds they would have changed are all lost to us. We will never know what futures might have been.
This is the saddest aspect to Yom Hazikaron. If it was just a day of memory - we are a nation that is sadly accustomed to mourning. But it's not just a day of grieving for the past, but a day of grieving for the present and future too.
I read once that what makes men saddest is when their sons join the army. Because they fought and they lost friends and they felt that pain of loss for one reason - so that their sons wouldn't have to. But time moves on and their sons do have to. Time moves on, and life moves on, but one day a year we stop to acknowledge past, present, and future pain.
Monday 24 April 2017
Friendly Fire: Why Do Some Fellow Jews Scorn The Ultra-Orthodox?
Dear Rabbi Shafran,
I read your recent articles in the the Forward and the
response written by Shoshanna Keats Jaskoll with great interest. You see, I
live in Ramat Beit Shemesh. As I am about to disagree with you, I cannot think
how to prove that I am not a chareidi-hater but simply a semi-chareidi Jew who
sees the actions of those extremist chareidim who live near me. I hear my
fellow moderate chareidim (the ones who made aliyah from America and are vocal
on local Facebook groups) defend the freedom of speech and right to protest of
these extremists who dress in chareidi clothing.
I have previously read what you've written with
respect for the position you hold, but your recent response to Shoshanna's
response in the Forward showed that, like many American chareidim, you are out
of touch with the reality in Israel and naively believe that Israeli chareidim
are just like you and that it behoves us to be tolerant of their difference of
opinions.
Sadly, this is not a case for tolerance. I am
tolerant of their decision not to join the army. I am tolerant of their choice
of dress and speech and even of their dislike of the army and the state in
which we all live. But I am not tolerant of their violence, their attacking me
and women like me, nor of their invading my neighbourhood in order to loudly
shout insults and death threats at a dati leumi man who works for the army. You
and many moderate chareidim think I should be tolerant. I think that your call
for tolerance of this sort is exactly what Shoshanna correctly labelled
abetting extremist chareidim.
Let me share some information with you to correct a
few of the points you made:
"Anecdotes, no matter how compelling, are not
evidence. Let’s assume that the claim of “hundreds” of radicals in Ramat Beit
Shemesh is not an exaggeration. And let’s add a similar number in Jerusalem’s
Mea Shearim. Let’s even round the number out to an even 1000 – though there is
no real evidence of that many prone-to-violence haredim.
According to the Myers-JDC-Brookdale institute, an
independent, American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee /Israeli government
effort, there were 911,000 haredim in Israel in 2014. 1000 hooligans represent
0.1097695% of haredim. Barely one-tenth of one percent"
There were over 10,000 men at the Peleg Yerushalmi
rally on Rosh Chodesh Nisan, when Rav Shmuel Auerbach asserted that they will
fight to avoid having to have anything to do with the army. Considerably more
than a tenth of a percent. Granted, they might not all be violent, but they did
all choose to attend a rally promoting violence, which should be taken as an
indication of their tendencies. Note these are only men: I assume that their
families share their views.
In Ramat Beit Shemesh Bet (where many of the most
extrerme chareidi fanatics live), there were pashkeveilim up along the main
street calling for every shul to daven from the amud for the destruction of
Yaacov Rashi, giving his hebrew name and his mother's name, and his entire
family.
(If you do not know who Yaacov Rashi is, then you
should really know before you pontificate about the real level of violence in
Ramat Beit Shemesh. Yaacov Rashi lives in the apartment building opposite mine.
He works for the Lishkat Hagiyus, in the unit that drafts Yeshiva boys. Note
that he does not force, pressure or in any way encourage yeshiva boys to sign
up. He merely processes their draft papers when they do choose to, such as to
enter the Nahal HaChareidi unit set up by Rav Aharon Leib Steinman. Because he
works in this role, however, chareidi extremists have elected him as public
enemy number one.)
Flyers have been scattered outside my building
against Yaacov Rashi, calling him a rasha, a rodef, a threat to all of am
yisrael, yemach shmo v'zichro (yes, those very words. I am happy to send you
photos of the flyers if you remain unconvinced as to the truth of my words). They
promised destruction for him and his whole family.
Groups of extremist chareidim regularly come to
protest outside his building, shout insults such as calling for him to die,
calling him a rodef and an eater of Jewish souls, and have tried to break into
his home. They come sometimes at 3am to disturb the whole neighbourhood
shouting insults and death threats.
In response, Rashi and his wife turned to the mayor
of Beit Shemesh, a 'moderate chareidi', and asked him for his support in
encouraging the local police force to squash the protesters. They asked him to
use his influence to make it clear that this behavior is not acceptable in our
town. His response: ‘This is not my problem’. That is the response of a
moderate chareidi in a position to do something about extremist chareidi
violence.
In the days before the giant Peleg Yerushalmi rally
of Rosh Chodesh Nissan, pashkeveilim were put up all around Ramat Beit Shemesh
aleph and bet, calling on all Jews to attend and promising to fight ‘to the
last drop of blood’.
Shoshanna is quite right about the children of Ramat
Beit shemesh bet throwing garbage and shouting insults at dati leumi girls who
walk through their neighbourhood on a shabbat. Dressed modestly, I might add,
in skirts to the knee and sleeves to the elbow, although without tights and in
bright colors. Teenage girls walking through RBS Bet on a Shabbat afternoon
really were set upon by a group of over 100 children throwing garbage and
shouting insults. When I walked through that neighbourhood on that same
Shabbat, it was only about 50 children who shouted 'shiksa' at me, an adult
woman in long skirt, long sleeves and a headscarf, walking together with my
bearded, black-hatted and –suited husband, which should have been some deterrent.
I presume that that number is ok with you?
And granted, these are only children. Where did
they learn this behaviour? How is it that my children know not to shout
‘parasite’ at a chasid walking down our street, even though there are some dati
leumi Jews who call chassidim ‘parasites’, and yet chareidi children do not
know not to shout ‘shiksa’ at a modestly-dressed girl who does not look like
their sisters?
And as for the absence of media reports being
‘proof’ that Shoshanna’s comments about the state of violence in Beit Shemesh
is just an exaggeration - those of us who live here are tired of being fodder
for the media circus. We chose not to call in the media this time because it
doesn't work. Media attention brings not one jot of pressure to bear upon the chareidi
extremists of our town, and not one jot of pressure to bear on ‘moderate
chareidim’ like those who make up our municipal board, who have made it clear
that they do not care to stand up against extremist chareidim who harass their
moderate chareidi or dati leumi neighbours. And one more thing – the American
chareidi facebook commenters who I referred to above, the ones who share your
belief that everyone who criticises extremist chareidi behaviour is a knee-jerk
chareidi-hater, they think that calling in the media shows that all that the
‘chareidi-haters’ want is media attention. Damned if you do, damned if you
don’t.
And are you right that there are moderate chareidim
who have condemned such extremist behaviour? Yes, absolutely. There are
chareidi rabbis and ordinary chareidim who stand up against extremist chareidi
behaviour in word and deed. But there is no mass feeling amongst moderate
chareidim that the behaviour of extremist chareidim is wrong. There is no
automatic response to stand up for what is right rather than for what is
right-wing. Instead, there is an automatic reaction to close ranks and support
those Jews who also wear black and white, because the non-chareidim must be the
enemy.
When a horde (almost 100) of extremist charieidi
members of the Peleg Yerushalmi descended on Rashi's building three days before
the Rosh Chodesh Nisan rally, it took 40 minutes for the police to arrive. In
that time, the only people preventing them from breaking into his building were
the regular residents of Ramat Beit Shemesh aleph, such as myself and my
neighbours. There are many many moderate chareidim who live here, as I'm sure
you know, but the vast majority of those who came down to stand against the
protesters (peacefully, may I add, without violence) were what you might call
dati leumi or chardal. We – myself and other adult women – were pushed, kicked,
and spat upon by the extremist chareidi protesters who bussed into our street
ready to attack Yaacov Rashi. And no, we gave no provocation other than
standing opposite them. And yes, these extremist chareidim came to physically
rip Rashi apart if he had stepped outside his front door.
Two days later, we (the Rashi’s neighbours) tried
to prepare for the expected return of the extremist protesters by organising a
system for notifying as many people as possible as quickly as possible of the
beginning of a protest, so that they could come to peacefully oppose the
protesters and make it clear that such behaviour is not acceptable in our town.
Most of all, we wanted to gather as many adult chareidi men as possible, so as
to show that chareidim do not condone this behaviour and to take the rug out
from under the extremists’ feet by showing that they do not speak for the
majority of chareidim.
We gathered almost 150 names on our ‘quick-response
list’, out of which only about 20 were American chareidi olim. In a
neighbourhood mostly populated by American chareidi olim, in response to
request shared by English speakers on forums frequented by American chareidim,
this is pathetic. Probably most of them also think that it’s not their
responsibility to stand up for ahavat yisrael, or even just for not calling for
a man to be killed, against their fellow chareidim.
If you complain about knee-jerk chareidi haters,
then I think you must consider the possibility of knee-jerk chareidi defenders,
who assume that a man who wears black and white must be believed over a woman
who wears a mitpachat and sandals.
I do not think that you deliberately set out to
disparage and belittle the sense of siege that is felt by those of us who live
in the midst of extremist chareidi protests. I think that you are unaware of
the reality of the situation. Please let me know, or Shoshanna, or my husband
if you would prefer, when you next come to Israel, and we will be happy to show
you around our neighbourhood so that you can learn the reality.
Best wishes,
Amanda Bradley
Ps. I did
not address you ignoring of the issue of erasing women's presence from
maagazines, adverts and periodicals, but suffice to say this topic has been
much discussed and it is absolutely clear that this was not the norm in
yeshivish chareidi circles, not in magazines, not in the Hamodia, not in the
Jewish observer and not in advertisements in free advertisers until the last
few years. Talk to any woman over the age of 60 and you will get a clearer
understanding.
Thursday 19 January 2017
War-weariness and war readiness
In the second decade of a new century, people were post-war and war-weary. A great war had just been fought which had been more catastrophic than any war that ever went before. Civilians had been targeted in a way which transcended belief and broke all the previous rules of warfare. A war which had to be fought had been waged and won - but at a terrible cost. Thousands of young people lost their lives fighting, but they believed that it was worth it. The war, they believed, was a just war. It had to be fought in order to protect innocent people from death, and to stop a tyrant from overrunning neighbouring countries.
Over the next three decades, the men and women who gave their futures to stop the spread of tyranny found their dreams were shattered. They had fought for the sake of a more just world. They had sacrificed their lovers and their lives in order to bring in a new world order. The dream of a world where people wouldn't live in poverty, where countries would trade with and help one another amicably seemed quiver on the threshold of actualisation. The men in power would be replaced with a fairer society, where the poor were helped to independence and the powerful chose to give of their power to the greater good. Communism and socialism were not yet seen as impossible ideologies used to keep a dictator in power. They were so popular precisely because of their promise of a fairer, more peaceful society.
They were also convinced that there would never be another war of the like of the one they had just endured. An unprecedented level of international cooperation grew up following the war, to replace international fighting with international discussion. They were sure that the immense, superhuman sacrifice of their generation was justified only because of the new world order that was beginning. There was no way, they were sure, that a world which had just been sickened by bloodshed would plunge itself back to torture and the creative discovery of new ways to kill people.
The generation which survived the war was committed to peace and to fairness, at almost any cost, They hated war, but more than they hated war they feared it. Most of all, the world's superpower, the mightiest country of all, feared war. They feared war talk and war tools and war thoughts. They relied on the new levels of international cooperation to keep international peace. They were so tired of intervening in the petty squabbles that sprang up between different countries.
They were betrayed.
Their leaders didn't change. Post-war promises didn't materialise. Nothing in society was altered to make it more fair or more just or to protect the most vulnerable. Gradually, all that endured was a fear of war, one could almost say a self-taught nausea in response to any kind of military action. Like Alex in The Clockwork Orange, the post-war generation felt physically sick at the contemplation of any kind of violence. Even violence in self-defense and for self-survival.
Their very belief in a new world order which would justify the shock and awe of the previous war would lead them directly to the next war. Intervening in a petty squabble between two nations had caused a deep-seated trauma in the collective consciousness which they were determined to avoid ever repeating. Next time, the nation chose a leader who would not repeat their earlier mistakes, and that leader came home from Munich with a triumph.
Less than a year later, the world was at war again.
Yes, I am talking about the second decade of the previous century. What we refer to as the 'interwar' period seems to us like a blip between two huge conflagrations. Often the two wars are run together, using the power of hindsight to categorise them as one conflict that had to be re-fought a second time. In many ways this is true, but to view the second world war as an inevitable coda is to shove the inter-war years under the carpet of history. It's extremely difficult for us in the 21st century to imagine the hope and sense of promise that filled the world after the end of the First World War. The young soldiers who survived carried the burden of their comrades who did not. The young women who died single because the men they would have married died at the Front lived their lives driven by the need to make a better world that justified their loved ones' sacrifice. I've recently been reading fiction that was written about the Great War, shortly after it ended. It is full of hope and belief in a new, just society around the world.
We are so full of the certainty that Chamberlain was wrong and weak when he signed the Munich agreement that we forget that the British public responded to his announcement with cheers and rejoicing at the successful evasion of another devastating war. Schoolchildren in England write history essays that dissect the ways that the Munich agreement paved the way to the Second World War, an approach which only pushes the reality of public opinion furhter into the bushes. We are so used to Winston Churchill as the war hero that we forget that in 1938 he was a crackpot trouble-maker who had been preaching war for decades to a country that was still convalescent from the last one.
In 2017, it is blatantly obvious that Hitler had to be fought and defeated. But in 1938, war-weariness and war-phobia created a fog of opposition to even the most necessary military campaign.
In 2017, we can confidently point out the seeds of the Second World War where they were planted in the aftermath of the Great War. Another popular high-school history essay topic is 'Was The Second World War Inevitable?'. As historians, we know that nothing is inevitable until it happens, but that doesn't change the opinion seared into our minds that the mishandling of the armistice in 1918 led directly to the declaration of war in 1939. It's so difficult, even for historians, to look back at yesterday without the burden of today's knowledge. In 1918 there were lone voices which sounded alarm at the terms of the Armistice. There are recorded opinions that Germany could rise again and that the continent could be plunged into war all over again if changes weren't made. Those voices were silenced, ridiculed, and ignored by a generation which couldn't bear to consider such a possibility.
In 2017, there are many ways that we are back in the inter-war period. Global mood today reflects that global mood then. We are tired of war and want to believe our leaders when they insist that global cooperation has removed all need for armed conflict. I suspect that the world is ripe for the resurrection of Chamberlain's reputation (see this article in Slate, telling you why Chamberlain was right). We are war-weary. America in particular, the world's superpower, is scared of war. We are scared of the cost of war, and still clinging desperately to the belief that we have changed the world and war is no longer necessary. We trumpet 'Never Again' as if it were our security blanket, but don't notice that it has quietly evolved into 'Never Again will we get involved in the petty troubles between two countries far away from us'.
If we learn anything from the inter-war years, it's that when flawed but free, democratic and progressive societies refuse to wield the tools of war, they will be picked up by those who are not restricted by such ethical niceties. Over the years from 1918-1938, the generation that fought and died in Flanders died once more as they lost all hope in their dream of a new world order. Shriveled and despondent, they concluded that war is pointless and changes nothing. The dictators of 1930s Europe came to the opposite conclusion.
It's not a coincidence that the UK's great war leader was of the generation before them, the generation that was accustomed to training for conflict. I doubt that anyone who came of age in the Great War could stomach leading a repeat of it.
Winston Churchill once said 'He who doesn't learn from history is doomed to repeat it'. I wish to see us learn quickly, because we are already living in a era of remakes.
The Hope Of The Inter War Years - And The Consequences Of Losing It
https://theringer.com/syria-barack-obama-legacy-853644abdd1b#.bzyiqnd9u
Over the next three decades, the men and women who gave their futures to stop the spread of tyranny found their dreams were shattered. They had fought for the sake of a more just world. They had sacrificed their lovers and their lives in order to bring in a new world order. The dream of a world where people wouldn't live in poverty, where countries would trade with and help one another amicably seemed quiver on the threshold of actualisation. The men in power would be replaced with a fairer society, where the poor were helped to independence and the powerful chose to give of their power to the greater good. Communism and socialism were not yet seen as impossible ideologies used to keep a dictator in power. They were so popular precisely because of their promise of a fairer, more peaceful society.
They were also convinced that there would never be another war of the like of the one they had just endured. An unprecedented level of international cooperation grew up following the war, to replace international fighting with international discussion. They were sure that the immense, superhuman sacrifice of their generation was justified only because of the new world order that was beginning. There was no way, they were sure, that a world which had just been sickened by bloodshed would plunge itself back to torture and the creative discovery of new ways to kill people.
The generation which survived the war was committed to peace and to fairness, at almost any cost, They hated war, but more than they hated war they feared it. Most of all, the world's superpower, the mightiest country of all, feared war. They feared war talk and war tools and war thoughts. They relied on the new levels of international cooperation to keep international peace. They were so tired of intervening in the petty squabbles that sprang up between different countries.
They were betrayed.
Their leaders didn't change. Post-war promises didn't materialise. Nothing in society was altered to make it more fair or more just or to protect the most vulnerable. Gradually, all that endured was a fear of war, one could almost say a self-taught nausea in response to any kind of military action. Like Alex in The Clockwork Orange, the post-war generation felt physically sick at the contemplation of any kind of violence. Even violence in self-defense and for self-survival.
Their very belief in a new world order which would justify the shock and awe of the previous war would lead them directly to the next war. Intervening in a petty squabble between two nations had caused a deep-seated trauma in the collective consciousness which they were determined to avoid ever repeating. Next time, the nation chose a leader who would not repeat their earlier mistakes, and that leader came home from Munich with a triumph.
Less than a year later, the world was at war again.
Yes, I am talking about the second decade of the previous century. What we refer to as the 'interwar' period seems to us like a blip between two huge conflagrations. Often the two wars are run together, using the power of hindsight to categorise them as one conflict that had to be re-fought a second time. In many ways this is true, but to view the second world war as an inevitable coda is to shove the inter-war years under the carpet of history. It's extremely difficult for us in the 21st century to imagine the hope and sense of promise that filled the world after the end of the First World War. The young soldiers who survived carried the burden of their comrades who did not. The young women who died single because the men they would have married died at the Front lived their lives driven by the need to make a better world that justified their loved ones' sacrifice. I've recently been reading fiction that was written about the Great War, shortly after it ended. It is full of hope and belief in a new, just society around the world.
We are so full of the certainty that Chamberlain was wrong and weak when he signed the Munich agreement that we forget that the British public responded to his announcement with cheers and rejoicing at the successful evasion of another devastating war. Schoolchildren in England write history essays that dissect the ways that the Munich agreement paved the way to the Second World War, an approach which only pushes the reality of public opinion furhter into the bushes. We are so used to Winston Churchill as the war hero that we forget that in 1938 he was a crackpot trouble-maker who had been preaching war for decades to a country that was still convalescent from the last one.
In 2017, it is blatantly obvious that Hitler had to be fought and defeated. But in 1938, war-weariness and war-phobia created a fog of opposition to even the most necessary military campaign.
In 2017, we can confidently point out the seeds of the Second World War where they were planted in the aftermath of the Great War. Another popular high-school history essay topic is 'Was The Second World War Inevitable?'. As historians, we know that nothing is inevitable until it happens, but that doesn't change the opinion seared into our minds that the mishandling of the armistice in 1918 led directly to the declaration of war in 1939. It's so difficult, even for historians, to look back at yesterday without the burden of today's knowledge. In 1918 there were lone voices which sounded alarm at the terms of the Armistice. There are recorded opinions that Germany could rise again and that the continent could be plunged into war all over again if changes weren't made. Those voices were silenced, ridiculed, and ignored by a generation which couldn't bear to consider such a possibility.
In 2017, there are many ways that we are back in the inter-war period. Global mood today reflects that global mood then. We are tired of war and want to believe our leaders when they insist that global cooperation has removed all need for armed conflict. I suspect that the world is ripe for the resurrection of Chamberlain's reputation (see this article in Slate, telling you why Chamberlain was right). We are war-weary. America in particular, the world's superpower, is scared of war. We are scared of the cost of war, and still clinging desperately to the belief that we have changed the world and war is no longer necessary. We trumpet 'Never Again' as if it were our security blanket, but don't notice that it has quietly evolved into 'Never Again will we get involved in the petty troubles between two countries far away from us'.
If we learn anything from the inter-war years, it's that when flawed but free, democratic and progressive societies refuse to wield the tools of war, they will be picked up by those who are not restricted by such ethical niceties. Over the years from 1918-1938, the generation that fought and died in Flanders died once more as they lost all hope in their dream of a new world order. Shriveled and despondent, they concluded that war is pointless and changes nothing. The dictators of 1930s Europe came to the opposite conclusion.
It's not a coincidence that the UK's great war leader was of the generation before them, the generation that was accustomed to training for conflict. I doubt that anyone who came of age in the Great War could stomach leading a repeat of it.
Winston Churchill once said 'He who doesn't learn from history is doomed to repeat it'. I wish to see us learn quickly, because we are already living in a era of remakes.
The Hope Of The Inter War Years - And The Consequences Of Losing It
https://theringer.com/syria-barack-obama-legacy-853644abdd1b#.bzyiqnd9u
Sunday 15 January 2017
My Daughter Losing a Best Friend Means I’m Losing a Daughter, Too
My daughter's best
friend's family is moving to a different town, and I am going to miss
her.
My daughter is 10 years
old, and she has a best friend. Every day they walk home together from school.
Almost every day, M comes home with Y alongside her, and they do their homework
together, sit side by side on the couch reading for hours on end or at the
table playing cards. They splash together in our little pool and play silly
games. Each of them is the others go-to person if they are bored. Y is used to
my daughter’s occasional tempers and waits patiently for her to snap out of
them if they happen while she's around, while my daughter knows when Y will
feel shy and how to make her feel comfortable. They share secret words and
funny nicknames.
But this is the thing: Y
is more than 'just' my daughter's best friend. We recognise her schoolbag in
the hallway and her shoes on the stairs. We know which foods she likes and what
games she likes to play. My younger son treats Y like another older sister; she
helps him with his homework, and he shouts at her not to tell him the answers
just like with his real older sister. Once I was coming in from picking up Son
from school, and we passed M with Y just walking home. The girls said goodbye
to each other and separated to their own homes, and Son said 'Where's Y
going?"
“Why?” wondered my son.
But now, Y’s family is moving away.
This is going to be hard for us in many ways. This family has always been very involved in our community, and by moving, there will be a huge gap in our midst. Y’s mother is my friend, and I will miss her. My husband and I know that we will have to support our daughter with “losing” her best friend.
When you are 10, having your best friend move away is a catastrophe, and a real loss. We tell M that she can call and talk to Y all the time, and they can email, and visit for sleepovers, but all of the adults know that at this age, a friendship is not the same when the kids can’t see each other every day. We know (and they know) that they are each losing their best friend.
And Y won’t be our bat bayit any more, either. I have to talk about it in terms of my daughter missing her friend and that I will miss mine, but the truth is that there is more than the one loss going on. A bat bayit is one of those phrases which is somewhat untranslatable in English. Literally, it means “a daughter of the house.” But in Israel, it’s an expression that’s used to define a different kind of family member. It’s not the same as an adopted child, because Y has her own family who love her very much (and won’t let us kidnap her and keep her when they move away). Bat bayit also doesn’t quite have the same connotations as “surrogate child,” either. The nearest I can come to defining it is to say that Y has become something of an extra daughter and sister in our family, in a way which is separate from my friendship with her mother. We are used to having her around. My sons are used to having her around. We all treat her as one of the family.
We've had our fair share
of bnei bayit, it has to be said. Special individuals who have come into our
lives and made themselves at home here. They build their own relationships with
our children and with us, and learn their way around our kitchen. Sooner or
later they leave for university, get married, or in some way or another move on
or move away. Each time, we know that we have no claim on our bnei bayit like
we have on our real children. They are part of our family because they chose to
be, and unlike with our own children, when they leave us they can move entirely
out of our lives. Each time, it is a little bit of a loss. Each time, we
wave them off knowing that they may never really be in touch and the
relationship will probably fizzle out, even though they think that it isn't
likely. But we - and our children - gain so much from these bnei bayit that it
is worth the sadness.
I don’t think I realized until now how much our children bring new special people into our lives. Only now that our children are old enough to have friends who spend long periods of time in our home, do I really see it, and possibly only because we’re losing one of them.
It’s often said that your friends are the family that you choose for yourself. There needs to be another line in that saying; perhaps, “your children’s friends are the family that your children choose for you.”
Now on Kveller
Tuesday 27 September 2016
How to live the yomim noraim with kids (& not just live through them)
Mothering Through The Days Of Awe: How To Live Them, Not Just Live
Through Them
(Skip to the bottom for a dropbox link to audio & video versions)
Section A - Reframing
Rosh
Hashanah and Yom Kippur - together, the Yomim Noraim, or Days of Awe - are
notoriously difficult days on which to be a mother. They are long, they are
lofty, on one of them we are fasting - and we have these little people to care
for at the same time, who don’t really care that much about our state of mind.
It’s hard enough to just live through them, let alone really living them.
In
my experience, what makes the most difference to our experience of the Yomim
Noraim is the attitude that we bring to them. So, some practical suggestions
follow, but I’d like to begin by reframing of the days.
Reframe #1: These are not sad days.
Rosh Hashanah is a day of majesty, not of sadness.
Let’s
take them one at a time. Rosh Hashanah is not a sad day. It’s not even,
actually, really a day of teshuvah (repentance). It is a day of majesty,
of awe, of awareness of the Divine. But it is not sad. You don’t have to be sad
on Rosh Hashanah, and you don’t get any brownie points for making your children
be sad.
Rosh
Hashanah is all about recognizing - and crowning - G-d as our King. In chassidus,
Rosh Hashanah is called Coronation Day. It’s the day on which we acknowledge
and accept G-d as our King, which means committing to keeping His laws. If you
look through the liturgy of Rosh Hashanah, there is no mention of repentance. We
do not say vidui (confession for our sins), or the ‘al chet’
prayer, or selichos on this day. Instead, our prayers stress G-d’s
majesty, kingship, omnipotence and greatness.
How
can we, lowly human beings, crown G-d as King? Simply by obeying Him.
A human
king truly earns his crown not through ritual or birth, but by his people’s
acceptance of his rule and obedience to his commands. Similarly, only we can
make G-d a king, by demonstrating our obedience to His decrees, regardless of
which job He has given us.
Many
years ago, I met a lady somewhere or other. We got chatting, and she told me
that her father had served in the British army during WW2.
“Oh,”
I said, “That’s so fascinating. Wow. You must be so proud of him. Where did he
fight?”
“He
didn’t fight,” she said.
I
was a bit puzzled. “What did he do?” I asked
“He
served in the mechanical airforce engineers. He worked very very hard during
the war, preparing the planes as fast as possible for the next sortie.”
My
first thoughts were ‘Shame’. I was a bit disappointed for her, actually - I’d
been quite excited that her father helped fight the Nazis and save my nation,
so this was a bit of a let-down. Fortunately, I didn’t say anything, and my
second thoughts were a lot more sensible. Without the mechanical airforce
engineers, there would have been no fighter planes, no bombers, no victory in
the Battle of Britain. So who did a ‘better’ job fighting the Nazis? The
glorious fighter pilots? Or the unsung engineers who pulled those planes back
together again so that they could go up again a few hours later? And what would
have happened if all those engineers had refused to serve as engineers and
demanded the glory of being fighter pilots?
G-d,
our King, has placed us in the position of caring for these small children. We
might rather have a more glorious or exciting role, but are we the ones to
question the King, especially on His Coronation Day? Our acceptance of our
difficult, overlooked, under-appreciated task of mothering through the Days of
Awe is an extremely important step in crowning G-d as the greatest King in the
universe. Even if we’d rather be fighter pilots.
Reframe #2: Advance the welfare of the nation
We’re
taught that on Rosh Hashanah, G-d gives out assignments to everyone in His
realm, and He allocates resources according to loyalty and the needs of those
assignments. It’s a day of harsh judgment based purely on what will advance the
welfare of His kingdom. There’s no room for rebels or sympathy for malingerers
(that comes on Yom Kippur). There is no space for weakness or pleas for
sympathy (that also comes on Yom Kippur). We want to spend this day
demonstrating that we are loyal workers and not traitors, that we deserve the
resources we want - health, mental stability, inner peace, financial security -
because we will use them well. We could stand in the synagogue all morning and
plead with G-d to believe us - or we could just show Him by doing the job He’s
given us.
Reframe #3: Yom Kippur is a festival
We
tend to bundle Yom Kippur together with Tisha b’av because both of them are
serious fasts, but the natures of the days could not be more different. Yom
Kippur is a chag. A festival. Not a sad day. It is a serious day, yes,
but it’s a yomtov. It’s important to remember this when looking after
children on Yom Kippur. Our children should enjoy
Yom Kippur.
I
know, that sounds like heresy. But it’s still true. They should have treats
like they do on Simchat Torah. They should wear their Shabbat clothes and play
special games and have extra-extra-special Mummy time, because it is Yom
Kippur. And you should do all of this giving to them from a place of strength,
knowing that you are demonstrating G-d’s love to them, that you are giving them
a good feeling about Yom Kippur and not raising them to dread and fear a
boring, angry day.
Reframe #4: You are the high priest
A
hefty portion of the musaf prayers on Yom Kippur are spent describing
the detail of the job of the Kohen Gadol (High Priest) and other priests
in the Mikdash (Temple). We read about how they spent the day cooking
the offerings, cleaning the floor and the utensils, opening and closing doors,
cleaning the ash off the altar, lighting the lights, etc. It all bears a
striking similarity to what we mothers spend our days doing! While others are
in synagogue reading about what the Kohen Gadol was doing, we are
actually living it. Try to envisage yourself as the High Priest cleaning up the
ash or preparing the offerings every time you have to clean up more spilled
food or serve yet another snack.
Reframe #5: You are an angel
I
really mean this literally. The Jewish understanding of a malach (angel)
is a being with no will of its own. A Jewish angel is a messenger of G-d who
only does the will of G-d. On Yom Kippur especially, we emulate angels. We
don’t eat or drink, we (in some areas only the men, in others both men and
women) wear white, we recite the second line of Shema ‘Baruch Shem Kavod
Malchuso L’Olam Va’ed’ out loud instead of whispering it, which our sages
teach is the way of the malachim. And we are malachim when we
make G-d’s Will be our will. When we look after the children He tasked us with,
with happiness and joy, and don’t try to make our will into G-d’s Will by
demanding to be in the synagogue praying instead.
Rabbi
Yitzchak Berkowitz teaches that whenever you feed a baby, or give food to a
child who wouldn’t be able to get that food themselves, you should say to
yourself this verse:
‘Pose’ach es yodecha u’masbia l’chol chai
ratzon
You
open up Your hand & sustain each creature with life’
G-d
gives each creature their food in order to sustain them. In the case of babies
and small children, the way in which G-d provides for their needs is through
us, their mothers. We are literally on a mission from G-d, malachim,
sent to give sustenance to His vulnerable creations. On Yom Kippur, serving
G-d, you really are an angel.
Reframe #6: Remember that each act is a holy act
Everything
that you do to look after your children is an act of service towards G-d. Each
time you do anything for them - feed them, change a diaper, play a game with
them, etc - you are obeying G-d’s obligation that you care for His creations.
It’s as holy as you make it be.
Rabbi
Aryeh Levine, the ‘Tzaddik of Jerusalem’, taught his daughters that
every time they do anything for their small children - changing a diaper,
feeding them, etc - they should recite this declaration of intent. It is
similar to that which many men recite before doing certain mitzvot like
shaking the lulav, or putting on tefillin:
“Hineni
muchan umezuman lakyem mitzvas gidul banim”
“Behold
I am ready and prepared to fulfill the holy commandment of raising children”
In
this way, you’ll remind yourself that what you are doing is not just messy,
smelly, and mundane. It’s holy service.
Reframe #7: G-d can still see you!
Most important of all! Don’t
be fooled into believing that you are only standing before G-d when you are in
the synagogue holding a machzor in your hand. Rosh Hashanah and Yom
Kippur do not end when you put the prayer-book down, and G-d can still see and
hear you when you’re looking after your children. You can still have a
spiritual, meaningful Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur in your own playroom. It’s
all in your state of mind.
Section B: Practical Prayer:
1. Do try to pray something every day even
when it is not the Yomim Noraim. This will keep you in the ‘habit’ of prayer
and keep that pathway open for you for the future when you are once again able
pray regularly.
It’s
traditional to recite Psalm 27 - L’David Hashem - twice a day during the month
of Elul. It reminds us that Rosh Hashanah is coming and gets us into the
mindset in preparation. I’m not suggesting that you manage to say the whole
thing - you’re not even getting through the regular prayers! - but a lot of
popular songs have been made out of different verses from the prayer. Try to
sing one of them aloud each day, or put on a recording of it, no matter how
much other prayer you’re managing. It will help you feel a sense of the Days of
Awe approaching.
2. Do make arrangements that work for you so that you can say some of the prayers of the day. Get together
with a friend and take it in turns to watch each other’s kids, if that works
for you. Get up early to pray in the morning before your children wake up
and/or before your husband leaves for shul. Remember that even if you don’t get
to daven in the morning, you can say the musaf prayer all afternoon until
sunset, and/or recite mincha in the afternoon too. Have your husband
watch the kids in the afternoon so that you can get in some prayer time, even
if it’s just half an hour to say amidah.
3. Maximize ma’ariv. You
can say ma’ariv - the evening prayer - all night. If you know you’ll
only be able to pray, meditate or focus when your children are in bed, then try
to hold off on going to sleep yourself and take this time to be your focused
prayer time. Send your children to bed early if you can. Especially on Yom
Kippur, make the most of this time. Pray with as much focus and concentration
as you can, because this is your best chance. You aren’t yet weak and tired out
from fasting, and you can wait until your husband comes home and leave him to
trouble shoot with your children while you pray.
4. Harness informal prayer. We’re
always taught about formal prayer, and it’s a very important thing, but when
we’re in the mothering trenches, formal prayer tends to go out the window and
what we need to grab hold of is informal prayer. Informal prayer is when you
direct your needs and lacks and hopes towards G-d, in your own words. It’s
making that counting-to-ten-trying-not-to-lose-your-temper into a prayer for
patience. It’s asking G-d for strength to get up off the couch and change yet
another dirty diaper. It’s saying ‘I’m doing this for You, G-d’ when you sit
down to read the same book for the umpteenth time. On Rosh Hashanah and Yom
Kippur (but on every other day too), shoot up short, informal requests for
whatever you might need at every opportunity. Turn your desperation into a
spiritual experience.
5. Self-care is also a mitzvah. You also serve G-d by resting. This is particularly true on Yom
Kippur when your resources are so depleted by fasting. If you need to sleep or
to rest, then do so. If you feel that you can only pray sitting down
(especially that long long Rosh Hashanah amidah), then do so. You do not
need to turn yourself into a limp rag just so that you can daven. Only
you can ever make this decision about how much you need to rest and whether you
could use the time to pray and still be a properly functioning mother for the
rest of the day, but don’t downplay the importance of self-care.
6. Don’t force children to go to the synagogue: I hope this is obvious, but do not take children to shul if
they are not ready and willing to be there. You will disturb other women who
have already ‘done their time’ staying home with small children, and could well
put your child off the whole idea of going to shul later on. Tiding a
small child over with a book and a (quiet) toy is fine as long as you are
prepared to take them out immediately that they begin to make any kind of
disturbance.
This applies to hearing the Shofar too. You do not need to hear the shofar in shul, nor is there a
time limit on when to hear it. You can hear the shofar up until sunset
on each day of Rosh Hashanah, at home or at someone else’s home. Find someone
in your community who can blow the Shofar for you later on, while your
husband is available to look after your children. And remember that you only
are obligated to hear the first 30 blasts of the shofar. All the rest
are Rabbinic level requirements from which you, as a busy mother, are exempt.
7.
Make the most of your praying time. If
you have a short window of time in which to pray, you know you can’t get
through everything.
Start
with what is most important – the amidah. If that’s all you’ll have time
for, then so be it.
If
you’ll have enough time, begin with the blessings before Shema and go
straight through until after the Amidah. If you’ll have even more time,
add in parts of pesukei d’zimrah – the psalms of praise that begin Shacharit.
Section C: How To Make The
Day Meaningful In The Mothering Trenches
1. Focus your day towards G-d, no
matter what you are doing. Think about the essence of the Rosh Hashanah and Yom
Kippur prayers at intervals during the day. Live this one day with the
awareness that you are standing before G-d; that these children are His
children; that your every action crowns Him as King more than anything that
anyone else can do. Remind yourself that as a child of G-d you too are capable
of greatness and deserve to have a relationship with Him.
2.
Prioritize: It’s more important to not get angry
than to pray. So do whatever you can to avoid putting yourself into situations
where you might get angry. That includes trying to rush to finish praying
because a toddler is pulling at your skirt, or shouting at your children to get
out the house, quick, so that you can get to the synagogue in time to hear the shofar.
Prioritize. What is more important, your calmness, patience, and sense of
happiness, or praying? Which one will serve G-d more fully?
3.
Sing. Sing songs from the liturgy of the Yomim Noraim to your children or
yourself. Find recordings of them beforehand so that you can refresh your
memory. Tunes are extremely evocative; just humming the tunes of prayers from
your childhood can put you into an entirely different place.
4.
Pray aloud. Even very small children can enjoy
hearing you sing your prayers on Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur. I found that
mine were always more willing to be quiet and wait for me if I was praying
aloud. I think it reassured them that I’m still there, and convinced them that
I actually was doing something and wasn’t just ‘reading’.
5.
Find ways to connect your activities that day to
the meaning of Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur.
·
If
your children already do some prayers in gan or playgroup, then take the time
to say them together with them. Sing them nicely, and include all the vaguely
Rosh Hashanah / Yom Kippur related songs that you know from CDs or your own
schooldays.
·
Small
children who know the shema get very excited about shouting out ‘baruch
shem kavod’ on Yom Kippur, so make a big thing of it.
·
Tell
your children stories about the Yomim Noraim. Try to borrow relevant storybooks
from the library or friends, or look up stories online beforehand so that you
can read them or re-tell them on Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur.
·
Rosh
Hashanah is the birthday of the world! One of my friends makes a special ‘happy
birthday world’ party for her kids on Rosh Hashanah. They make decorations and
birthday signs before the yomtov, and sing Rosh Hashanah songs and eat birthday
food at a birthday party breakfast/brunch during that long Rosh Hashanah
morning.
6.
Plan ahead.
·
Make
or buy yummy treats for them, so that they connect these days to happiness and
satisfaction.
·
Remember
that shul usually finishes very late on Rosh Hashanah, and even bigger children
can get very irritable waiting that long to eat. Plan to give your kids a good,
special kiddush once you’re all ready, and/or an early special lunch by
themselves (appoint a child to be the ‘shabbos daddy’ and ‘shabbos mummy’ for
extra excitement!) so that they don’t drag you down with hunger-induced
grumpiness.
·
Similarly,
remember to plan a real festive meal for their lunch on Yom Kippur. For them
it’s a real festival.
·
Put
a few toys or games away now, so that you can take them out ‘new’ on Rosh
Hashanah and Yom Kippur. Or swap with a friend, or buy some new small toys from
the dollar store, and bring them out for that really difficult Yom Kippur
afternoon stretch.
·
Remember
that you can pray at the park as well!
·
Plan
to begin the seudah hamafsekes - the final meal before Yom Kippur - well
in advance, so that you’ll have enough time to eat and drink enough before the
fast begins.
Dropbox link to a recording of this in shiur format (skip the first 10 min or so, they were just people introducing themselves, etc):
Dropbox link to a video of this shiur (the last 10 min are missing, and it was nighttime, everyone was tired):
Dropbox link to a video of this shiur (the last 10 min are missing, and it was nighttime, everyone was tired):
Sunday 21 August 2016
What is the post-high school year in Israel for, for girls?
In response to this Facebook post by Sarah Bronson, decrying that girls in sems are directed to fundraise for a charity that helps funds weddings.
Sarah's complaint was that by encouraging the girls to fundraise dafka for a charity which funds weddings, organizations like the OU and Yeshiva University are subtly pushing the message that what matters for girls is marriage.
It's a good point. Of course it could have come about in an innocent way (maybe the wife of a high OU exec runs the charity, for example?). My issue goes a bit further - not they are fundraising for this charity while the boys fundraise for another, but why are they fundraising and the boys are not?
When I was in sem (midreshet lindembaum), I once went with a friend for a Shabbat meal at the home of some relative of hers. This relative asked us a lot about what chessed programs we were involved in that year, & then expressed his disappointment that lindenbaum neglects to train girls in doing chessed enough. I no longer remember his exact words, but he was very clear that the priority for girls is to do chessed. The priority fir boys is to learn.
We were all rather offended. Of course chessed is a priority, but it should be a priority for both sexes. And this year was our year to immerse ourselves in Torah learning before we become swept away with the myriad distractions and responsibilities of life. Why should we be spending it scrubbing floors or caring for children - or fundraising for anything?
Boys in yeshivah programs are expected to focus on learning. The emphasis is on making the most of this one, two, or however many years in the cocoon of yeshivah to absorb as much Torah as you can before moving on. No one seems to worry that boys might, as a result, choose not to marry. Or that they might never do chessed. So why are girls given the message that they have dedicate learning time to choir competitions and fundraising and chessed projects, rather than to actually learning Torah?
(NB. Look, I'm not saying chessed isn't important. It is. But how do you weight your message in what for girls is almost always the one year of high-intensity torah learning? Do we want to give them message that Torah learning is what they are here for and what they should concentrate on, or that Torah learning is just one of the many things they could be involved in during their gap year before college?)
Sarah's complaint was that by encouraging the girls to fundraise dafka for a charity which funds weddings, organizations like the OU and Yeshiva University are subtly pushing the message that what matters for girls is marriage.
It's a good point. Of course it could have come about in an innocent way (maybe the wife of a high OU exec runs the charity, for example?). My issue goes a bit further - not they are fundraising for this charity while the boys fundraise for another, but why are they fundraising and the boys are not?
When I was in sem (midreshet lindembaum), I once went with a friend for a Shabbat meal at the home of some relative of hers. This relative asked us a lot about what chessed programs we were involved in that year, & then expressed his disappointment that lindenbaum neglects to train girls in doing chessed enough. I no longer remember his exact words, but he was very clear that the priority for girls is to do chessed. The priority fir boys is to learn.
We were all rather offended. Of course chessed is a priority, but it should be a priority for both sexes. And this year was our year to immerse ourselves in Torah learning before we become swept away with the myriad distractions and responsibilities of life. Why should we be spending it scrubbing floors or caring for children - or fundraising for anything?
Boys in yeshivah programs are expected to focus on learning. The emphasis is on making the most of this one, two, or however many years in the cocoon of yeshivah to absorb as much Torah as you can before moving on. No one seems to worry that boys might, as a result, choose not to marry. Or that they might never do chessed. So why are girls given the message that they have dedicate learning time to choir competitions and fundraising and chessed projects, rather than to actually learning Torah?
(NB. Look, I'm not saying chessed isn't important. It is. But how do you weight your message in what for girls is almost always the one year of high-intensity torah learning? Do we want to give them message that Torah learning is what they are here for and what they should concentrate on, or that Torah learning is just one of the many things they could be involved in during their gap year before college?)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)